[Aztlan] Early Writing Systems (Beijing conf.)

[ECOLING at aol.com]

The following came through an Ancient Near East discussion list.

*

The conference "Origins of Early Writing Systems" took place at the
University of Peking in October, 2007.  The event could be considered
a precursor to the Olympics, as "top" scholars from countries around
the world participated.

The proceedings can now be downloaded from posted
<http://www.caeno.org/origins/>. They include papers and sound
recordings of the presentations at the conference.

Abstracts Papers Presentations

Pier Giorgio Borbone, Univ. di Pisa
Semitic Writing in China
A study of the use of the Syriac alphabet in China, both for Turkic
and Semitic languages. PRESENTATION (4137kb)

Francoise Bottéro, French National Center for Scientific Research
Chinese Writing: Ancient Indigenous Perspective
1) Mythologizing the origins of writing (Cangjie), 2) Systematizing
the evolution of Chinese writing (Shuowen xu), 3) Classifying the
Chinese graphs, 4) Analyzing the Chinese graphs, 5) Sorting out
terminologies.
DISCUSSION (492kb)---FULL PAPER Adobe pdf Format

Eva Cancik-Kirschbaum, Freie Universitat, Berlin
Spaces in between. Reading and the Origins of Early Writing
The Ancient Near Eastern documentation regarding early script is
formest considered under the aspect of writing ( as a developping
technique, as a cognitivie skill, etc.). The paper will adress another
perspective, namely the process of reading. Unfolding the clusters of
information given in protocuneiform and early cuneiform means to
active a number of perceptive tools and skills. To what extent did
this process influence the conception and development of early
writing? PRESENTATION (3284kb)

Gregory Chambon, Freie Universitat, Berlin
Counting, Calculating, Representing: Origins of writing sexagesimal
numbers in Mesopotamia
The information we have about the representation (both mental and
graphic) of numbers base on the written sources. Writing however is
more than a means to represent concepts, objects and words: it is a
Kulturtechnik which follows rules of tradition, transmission and
innovation. The aim of the present paper is to address new questions
about sexagesimal numbers in place value notation, which will try to
take into account the functions of writing: What do exactly 'origins'
mean? How were the number notations read? In which context were the
different sumstems of number notation used? PRESENTATION (6488kb)

Jerrold Cooper, Johns Hopkins University
Pictures of the Mind: Early Writing in Ancient Iraq and Ancient China
Similarities and differences of 1) the structural and formal
properties of the two writing systems, 2) the contexts in which they
arose, 3) the influence of writing on language and the way the
ancients analyzed language, and 4) the influence of the two writing
systems on neighboring regions. PRESENTATION (4816kb)

Jacob L. Dahl, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science & Freie
Universitat, Berlin
Deciphering Proto-Elamite
Dahl will address the following questions: (When) can we distinguish
early Iranian writing from early Mesopotamian writing? Can we isolate
distinct writing-phases in proto-Elamite? Can we verify Meriggi's
proposal of the existence of restricted 'vocabularies' in
proto-Elamite? Can we use what we know about the proto-Elamite
writing-system to say something about early Iran? PRESENTATION
(4756kb)
FULL PAPER Adobe pdf Format

Robert Englund, UCLA
The Smell of the Cage
Englund will assess the impact of the archaic Sch?yen collection on
our understanding of the development of early cuneiform from Uruk V
(clay bullae and tokens) through III (emphasizing labor organization).
This matter is tied in with the question of how professional
organizations in Europe and the US are restricting expert
communications concerning information deriving from unprovenienced
collections.
PRESENTATION (4923kb)---FULL PAPER Adobe pdf Format

Jean-Jacques Glassner, French National Center for Scientific Research
The Invention of Writing, the Old Babylonian school and the Semiology
of the Diviners
Teaching the way to built written signs in old Babylonian schools, and
reading omina as written signs by old Babylonian diviners.
PRESENTATION (4923kb)---FULL PAPER Adobe pdf Format

Yinghui Ge, Peking University
The Origin of Numbers and Characters
When we discuss the origin of Chinese writing, the foremost question
to ask is what the earliest characters are and how these characters
were invented.
Scholars in the Han dynasty thought that the earliest characters were
all pictographic. Scholars in the Qing dynasty supposed that "the
numerals are earlier than other characters". In the past half century,
the study on the prehistoric carved signs has established the
conformity of these theories with what we now know as facts about the
origin and the development of Chinese characters.
Numbers were important elements of the prehistoric carved signs.
According to our study, the numbers also came from pictures, although
they stand for abstract notions. The objects which the numbers imitate
are the tools that the ancient people used. Numbers were used to
manage clan affairs and protect the society system. So, it's very
natural that numbers are the components of the initial characters.
The pictorial approach to express and record numbers is exactly the
same method ancient Chinese used to develop the earliest writing
system. All the later characters that are not pictographic are the
development of the early pictographs. PRESENTATION (5921kb)

Yushu Gong, Peking University
Graph Typology of Ancient Chinese and Sumerian Writing Systems
A comparison of the cuneiform and Chinese writing systems and their
origins. Because the systems are so similar structurally, comparing
them may be crucial to understanding how these systems work and how
they came about. PRESENTATION (3886kb)

Wayne Horowitz, Hebrew University
Old Babylonian Period Tablets at Hazor: The Earliest Writings of The
Cuneiform Southwest
Cuneiform came late to the Land of Canaan (Modern Israel and
Palestine) when compared with Mesopotamia and Syria, arriving only in
the time of The Old Babylonian period, c. 1800-1600 BC. At this time,
Hazor in the Galilee emerged as center of cuneiform writing and
maintained ties with cities such as Mari on the Middle Euphrates and
Hammurabi¡¯s Babylon. This paper will examine the Old Babylonian
period Hazor tablets, the earliest written records from The Cuneiform
Southwest (Israel, Palestine, Jordan, Egypt) as a test case of how
foreign scripts (Mesopotamian cuneiform in this case) come to be
borrowed into new territory for local use, and then undergo change to
fit their new environment. Comparisons may be drawn from the spread of
Chinese characters beyond the borders of China in Asia, and the
subsequent use of the characters to represent languages other than
Chinese.
PRESENTATION (3656kb)---FULL PAPER Adobe pdf Format

Jun Ikeda, Tsukuba Univ., Japan
An Examination of Early Japanese Writing.
An examination of early Japanese writing to determine whether any
parallels exist with Mesopotamian writing. PRESENTATION
(2768kb)---FULL PAPER Adobe pdf Format

Isabelle Klock-Fontanille, Univ. de Limoges
The genesis of Luwians hieroglyphics
Concerning the question of Luwians hieroglyphics, a certain number of
debates have arisen, especially about its origin, the place and date
of its manifestation. About the first point, some researchers go for a
foreign origin, but most of them agree on the fact that hieroglyphics
were produced by the Hittites. Nevertheless, two points still remain:
the right moment the hieroglyphics become a writing system proper; the
kind of relationships between Luwians hieroglyphics and cuneiforms
used by Hittites. I would examine the change from a system of symbols
used for administrative or commercial exchanges to the system regarded
as hieroglyphic, strictly speaking. Can critiria be defined? Can
processes be depicted? Can models be proposed, and be generalized and
applied to other writing systems? PRESENTATION (4938kb) ---FULL PAPER
Adobe pdf Format

Th. J. H. Krispijn, University of Leiden
The Earliest Mesopotamian Script and the Dawn of Phonetics
The lexical lists from the Uruk IVa and Uruk III are important sources
for our understanding the mechanisms of the earliest script in
Mesopotamia. In my paper I will discuss the phonetics of the
protocuneiform script mainly in the lexical lists in relation to its
logographic use and the problem which language the earliest script
records.
PRESENTATION (3802kb)

Fan Lin, Univ of PLA, China
A Calligrapher's Interpretation of Early Chinese Writing.
The eminent calligrapher Lin Fan will present a calligrapher's
interpretation of early Chinese writing.
PRESENTATION (5860kb)

Joachim Marzahn, Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin
Scribal Techniques in the Material of the Texts from Uruk IV-III.
PRESENTATION (3803kb)

Gebhard Selz, University of Vienna
The Evolution of Early Mesopotamian Writing Systems as Reflected in
Lexical Lists
In the last years, the earliest lexical tradition received
considerable interest, the interpretations either stressing their
technical purpose as tools for teaching and transmitting literacy or
their historical value permitting insight in the world-view of these
early societies. The paper is based on the assumption that
classification processes are a corner stone for any understanding of
the development of early writing. Drawing on the results of Glassner,
Veldhuis and others it will address the question which principles of
order can be observed, from sign formation, the sequence of signs to
the establishment of lexical ¡°themes¡±. A short final section of the
paper argues that writing was essential for the creation of various
new sub-systems in the mental and societal spheres and that there was
never a strict distinction between these newly created "worlds" and
the physical world. PRESENTATION (4203kb)

Theodora Seal, University of Geneva
A peculiar aspect of the cuneiform script: the Diri-compound
Assyriologists name "Diri-compound" a certain type of complex
logogram, a number of which are attested in the earliest texts. The
Mesopotamian lexical tradition, which is the result of centuries of
scribal reflection on the Sumerian language and writing system,
constitutes a possible source for a better understanding of these
logograms. In particular an analysis of certain features of the Diri
lexical lists should shed some light on how the Babylonian scribes
themselves conceived of their writing system.
PRESENTATION (2352kb)---FULL PAPER Adobe pdf Format

John Steele, University of Durham
Some of the earliest preserved Chinese writing deals with divination
and corresponding celestial phenomena. Consequently, it would be
worthwhile to explore the language of astronomy in Babylonia and China
in an attempt to understand whether there are any conceptual
similarities between Babylonian and ancient Chinese astronomy.
PRESENTATION (4128kb)---FULL PAPER Adobe pdf Format

Benjamin Studevent-Hickman, Oriental Institute, Chicago
Directionality in the Cuneiform and Chinese Scripts.
Cuneiform and Chinese are among those scripts that could--and still
can, in the case of the latter--appear in different directions
depending on context. The evidence and reasons for this vary, and
while there are studies comparing the two scripts, few of them have
looked at directionality. This paper hopes to fill this gap by
examining the origins and development of the two scripts with
directionality in mind. Various factors that might have led to
differences in script direction are considered, including foreign
influence and the pictographic and logosyllabic nature of the Chinese
and Sumero-Akkadian writing systems (following Xu Shen's six
principles). Considerations from Cognitive Science also inform the
discussion.
PRESENTATION (4883kb)---FULL PAPER Adobe pdf Format

John Tang, Peking University, Beijing
A comparative study of phonetic complements in Near Eastern cuneiform
and Jurchen siniform
The cuneiform originating from Sumerian proto-pictography will be
investigated along with phonetic complements in Jurchen script (which
stems from the neighboring Chinese characters and Khitan scripts).
This analysis may aid in deciphering some medieval Northeastern
scripts.
PRESENTATION (3784kb)---FULL PAPER Adobe pdf Format

Gordon Whittaker, Universitaet Goettingen, Germany
Chinese and Mesoamerican writing: A further comparison of early systems
A presentation comparing the Shang script with the earliest
Mesoamerican systems of writing. PRESENTATION (3090kb)

Mark Wilson, CCSG, London
New Sources and New Implications: Fossil Rabbits in the Precambrian
The work is based on a previously unresearched archive of 140 archaic
administrative tablets, the largest and most significant source of new
evidence on the origins of cuneiform writing since the discovery of
the Uruk IV tablets in the early part of the last century.
PRESENTATION (5331kb)

*

Lloyd Anderson
Ecological Linguistics
PO Box 15156
Washington DC 20003
ecoling at aol.com
202-547-7683



**************
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? 
Read reviews on AOL Autos.
      
(http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00050000000017 )