[Aztlan] Teotihuacan goddess question

[Bertrand Lobjois]

Hi Nandi !

There is no consensus about this sculpture. I recommend you to find Aurélie
Couvreur's Ph D. in 2004 before Paulinyi's paper. She explains very well all
this controversy...
This is the complete reference :
Couvreur, Aurélie
2004. La religion de Teotihuacan (Mexique). Etude iconographique et
symbolique des principales divinités teotihuacaines.
Doctorat en philosophie et lettres, Orientation histoire de l'art et
archéologie. Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles.
http://theses.ulb.ac.be/ETD-db/collection/available/ULBetd-12112004-111702/

Use Babelfish or other webtranslator for english.

Bertrand LOBJOIS
Universidad de Monterrey
Division de Ciencias Sociales

2008/12/11 nandi cohen <nandi.cohen en hotmail.com>

>
>
> Hello all,
>
> I was wondering if I could get some feedback about the whole Teotihuacan
> Great Goddess controversy.  I recently read an article by Zoltan Paulinyi
> from 2006 that contested a series of attributions made to the Great Goddess,
> and ultimately argued that the term had become so generalized as to be of no
> use at all.  I was wondering if anything has been published on this issue
> since, and if there is a general scholarly consensus on the matter.
>
> Many thanks in advance for your input,
>
> Nandi Cohen
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Suspicious message? There's an alert for that.
>
> http://windowslive.com/Explore/hotmail?ocidTXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_broad2_122008
> _______________________________________________
> Aztlan mailing list
> http://www.famsi.org/mailman/listinfo/aztlan
> Click here to post a message Aztlan en lists.famsi.org
> Click to view Calendar of Events
> http://research.famsi.org/events/events.php
>
>
>


-- 
http://mexiqueancien.blogspot.com

Un blog archéologique en français sur la Mésoamérique