[Aztlan] Itzamna, God N and Bakab

[Mike Geubel]

Dear Justin,

I have done some research and found some examples of Bakabs and Chaks
holding the sky from the Classic period:
- The door of temple 22 in Copan contains two Bakabs holding the Milkyway.
- The roof of the temple of the Sun in Palenque contains four figures
holding a skyband. These figures have the same crocodile-like-face as the
Chaks and wear the same neckless as the Bakabs in Copan; they also hold an
ax.

So, from these two examples it seams that these Bakabs and Chaks all up the
sky.

Also it is said that Itzamna and Chak Chel (or Ix Chel) created the
skybearers, so they can be seen as their parents. But looking from another
perspective it is also true that the skybearers are manifestations of
Itzamna and Chak Chel, the creator grandparents. Maybe two skybearers are
male and the other two female: air and fire are male elements, the
directions for north and east, and water and earth are female elements, the
directions for south and west.

Kind regards,
Mike Geubel


2007/12/27, Justin Kerr <mayavase at verizon.net>:
>
> Dear Mike and Friends,
>
> This question, and I would like to add, a good one, should unleash a very
> long series of answers.
>
> I would like to mention an incident of many years ago. I was sitting next
> to
> Linda Schele at a dance performance in Israel. We were told that the next
> dance would represent a Hasidic (very orthodox) wedding; I grinned and
> told
> Linda that the 4 bacabs would come out and hold up the sky. Linda, in her
> usual way told me, in language I won't repeat, that was a bit of nonsense.
> However when 4 men come on stage and held up a canopy on 4 poles, Linda
> was
> quite taken aback.
>
> I am certainly not trying to make a case for cross cultural connections; I
> merely wish to suggest that it is necessary to define which deities we are
> discussing and how those deities are defined by the people who made them.
> I think it is important to realize that the very late document, The
> Dresden
> Codex, (from which the alphabet deities derive) does not generally match
> the
> images that appear on the Classic period ceramics. There are similarities
> to
> be sure, but I do not believe that anyone can show an image of the bacabs
> on
> any Classic ceramics. If Chak or God N are bacabs, their behavior on
> ceramics does not match any action of holding up the sky. If we look at
> the
> behavior of the ax bearing Chak, then we see, rather than supporting the
> temple, he is breaking the temple down (see for example K2068 and K2772).
> I believe that we still have a long way to go in understanding all or even
> part of the deity's functions in the Classic period.
>
> How for example do we interpret the image on K3124 where we seem to have
> an
> image of God N and a juvenile version of the same? Why for example is it
> that God N is the deity (in the Highlands) who is humiliated after the
> defeat of the Lords of the Otherworld and it is God L in the lowlands?
> (K578
> and K2847 [Highlands], K1560 [lowlands].
> This is certainly not the last word.
>
> Justin Kerr
>
> --Original Message-----
> From: aztlan-bounces at lists.famsi.org [mailto:
> aztlan-bounces at lists.famsi.org]
> On Behalf Of Mike Geubel
> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 3:34 PM
> To: Aztlan at lists.famsi.org
> Subject: [Aztlan] Itzamna, God N and Bakab
>
> Hello,
>
> This is my first post on the Aztlan mailing list. I have a question about
> God N:
> Linda Schele says that the four God N deties are equal to the four Bacabs.
>
> Karin Bassie also wrote in her document 'Maya Creator Gods' on page 30:
> "God
> N was a Bakab, but as David Stuart has noted neither T1014 nor T64 ever
> substitutes with any of the numerous examples of the pa signs." Later in
> this document Karrin Bassie says that God N and God D are the same deity:
> Itzamna.
>
> Because of this I conclude that the four Bakabs are manifestations of
> Itzamna, and because of that also the four Chaaks are manifestations of
> him.
> Somewhere (I don't know the source anymore) I have red that the Bakabs or
> Chaaks are Itzamna's sons, so they don't match up.
>
> And are the Chaaks, Bakabs and Pawahtun the same?
>
> Can somebody help me with this please?
>
> Kind regards,
> Mike Geubel
> _______________________________________________
> Aztlan mailing list
> http://www.famsi.org/mailman/listinfo/aztlan
> Click here to post a message Aztlan at lists.famsi.org
> Click to view Calendar of Events
> http://research.famsi.org/events/events.php
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten,

Mike Geubel

Mijn reizen: http://geubel.blogspot.com
Mijn blog:  http://mikegeubel.blogspot.com