[Aztlan] 13.0.0.0.0

[D. M. Urquidi]

Folks:

--- On Wed, 7/23/08, John Major Jenkins <kahib at ix.netcom.com> wrote:

Technically speaking. . . . ***if we accept*** that the 13 Baktun cycle repeats . . . 13.0.0.0 ***would be true only if***. . . .  most likely ***related to a World Age doctrine*** . . . involving cyclical time . . . abstract DN math is something else . . .  ***a more abstract calculus*** of deep time). . . 

The above is a fine example of ***abstract*** proofs, but why kick in the World Age concept? That has nothing to do with the current search for provable data that is necessary when attempting to make a concise statement. Did I miss something here?

Dea