[Aztlan] Jaguars in Formative Valley of Mexico
Jaime Pretell
jaime_pretell at hotmail.com
Sun Jul 27 21:22:43 CDT 2008
I would disagree with that interpretation that leopards per se are older
than jaguars. Just their lineage.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Rogers" <bwrogers at dslextreme.com>
> The paleontological record has shown that jaguars evolved from
> leopards, a genus that itself apparently evolved in India some 5
> million years ago, or at least that's what the current fossil record
> tells us.
The jaguar and the leopard do indeed descend from the same branch, but that
ancestor was not a leopard, just the common ancestor of both. In fact the
earliest evidences of leopards had more jaguar like traits than leopardine.
It is only because this common ancestor was in Asia that they called them
leopards. By taxonomy they would have been refered to as Jaguars.
http://golab.unl.edu/teaching/SBseminar/leopardMOLECOL.pdf
If anything, the basal group as far as most distant in genetic divergence
in modern populations it is the clouded leopard.
Genetic relationships between Leopard and jaguar are shown on pages 341-352
and show the Jaguar to split from the Leopard and the lion at different
points depending on the marker. The final chart shows the divergence of the
leopard line and the lion/jaguar line is first and then jaguars and lions
diverge from each other. But again, those ancestors did not look like
leopards, but more like jaguars in shape.
http://home.ncifcrf.gov/ccr/lgd/staffinfo/staff/pdf/Johnson_genetic%20assess_suppdata_vol311.pdf
As to Jaguars in the lake basin in the valley of Mexico I have yet to find
any study that indicates such fossil or skeletal remains. I would love to
read it. It sounds like an interesting read. You wouldn't have a link would
you?
More information about the Aztlan
mailing list