[Aztlan] Mayas desaparecieron por cambio en clima de ciudades Aztlan Digest, Vol 28, Issue 17

Hube Smith husmith at charter.net
Thu Mar 20 12:09:42 CDT 2008


I would counsel caution regarding tradition among the Yucatec Maya. For one 
thing, they certainly DO hold beliefs

and engage in practices which are traditional. Also, they conserve the 
Yucatec Maya language within an immense

pool of  persons, perhaps a million of them. This makes them an astoundingly 
significant intact language group in

the Americas.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Saude Pavón" <pavonsaude at hotmail.com>
To: <aztlan at lists.famsi.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Aztlan] Mayas desaparecieron por cambio en clima de ciudades 
Aztlan Digest, Vol 28, Issue 17


Hola a Todos!!
   Me gustaría decir que a pesar de los pueblos indígenas existentes hoy en 
día, podríamos decir que ninguno de ellos conservan las tradiciones 
ancestrales. LAs trdiciones que vemos celebran hoy en día, son el resultado 
de los años de colonialismo impuesto. Sincretismo?... No.. personalmente, 
opino que, al menos en el mundo maya no existió tal fenómeno inventado por 
occidente. Acaso los mayas entendieron el significado de Alma?, o 
Infierno?... En el cristianismo estos términos son muy diferentes y están 
muy alejados de lo que es en la mitología maya.
  Desgraciadamente, todos los gobiernos después de la Colonia hasta la 
actualidad han hecho ver que el ser indígena, o hablar las lenguas 
(distintas al castellano) sea mal visto. Las clases altas de estos países 
sueñan con parecerse a los blancos del norte... Lo que crea un gran abismo 
entre la misma población de un mismo país... Hablemos de México, Guatemala, 
El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, etc... Es muy penoso ver como estamos 
destruyendo una gran cultura como la Maya.



> From: aztlan-request at lists.famsi.org> Subject: Aztlan Digest, Vol 28, 
> Issue 17> To: aztlan at lists.famsi.org> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 
> 12:00:02 -0500> > Send Aztlan mailing list submissions to> 
> aztlan at lists.famsi.org> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide 
> Web, visit> http://www.famsi.org/mailman/listinfo/aztlan> or, via email, 
> send a message with subject or body 'help' to> 
> aztlan-request at lists.famsi.org> > You can reach the person managing the 
> list at> aztlan-owner at lists.famsi.org> > When replying, please change the 
> Subject line of your email to match> the exact topic being discussed, and 
> delete all but the most important> text from previous messages.> > > When 
> replying, please remove all topics not related to your reply.> > Today's 
> Topics:> > 1. ARCHAEOLOGY CHANNEL NEW VIDEO ON THE MAYA AND THE MIRADOR> 
> BASIN (michael ruggeri)> 2. UPDATE ON THE MIAMI CIRCLE (michael ruggeri)> 
> 3. Mayas desaparecieron (Nick Hopkins)> 4. Re: Mayas desaparecieron por 
> cambio en clima de!
  ciudades> ( Diego V?squez Monterroso )> 5. ANCIENT PACIFIC COAST TRADE 
REPLICATED (michael ruggeri)> 6. Re: UPDATE ON THE MIAMI CIRCLE (Doug 
Weller)> 7. Re: Mayas desaparecieron por cambio en clima de ciudades> (Henry 
Avila)> 8. Re: UPDATE ON THE MIAMI CIRCLE (Collins, Lori)> 9. Re: ANCIENT 
PACIFIC COAST TRADE REPLICATED (Benjamin Carter)> > 
 > --**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**> 
 > Message: 1> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:29:10 -0500> From: michael ruggeri 
<michaelruggeri at mac.com>> Subject: [Aztlan] ARCHAEOLOGY CHANNEL NEW VIDEO ON 
THE MAYA AND THE> MIRADOR BASIN> To: aztlan at lists.famsi.org> Message-ID: 
<B00FC852-910A-4058-9FE4-F148CDB3D232 at mac.com>> Content-Type: text/plain; 
charset=-ASCII; format=owed> > > Listeros,> > A New free!
  video on the Maya and the Mirador Basin> > http://www.archaeologychan
nel.org/> > Mike Ruggeri> > > > > > Mike Ruggeri's Maya World> 
http://tinyurl.com/ypkq2v> > Mike Ruggeri's Maya Archaeology News and Links> 
http://community-2.webtv.net/Topiltzin-2091/MIkeRuggerisMaya/index.html> > > 
 > > > > > > > > > > > 
 > --**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**> 
 > Message: 2> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:02:13 -0500> From: michael ruggeri 
<michaelruggeri at mac.com>> Subject: [Aztlan] UPDATE ON THE MIAMI CIRCLE> To: 
aztlan at lists.famsi.org> Message-ID: 
<E5D8BCE9-7A56-4D40-89F8-E5FF0504E0F3 at mac.com>> Content-Type: text/plain; 
charset=-ASCII; delsp=s; format=owed> > > Listeros,> > The important 
archaeological site known as the Miami Circle was saved > from developers by 
the state of Florida in 2000 and a cultural museum > will go up on the site. 
It is probably the work of the nomadic > Tequesta culture. The radio-carbin 
dates place this site at 2000 > years old. Among the items e!
 xcavated are shell tools, stone axe > heads, human teeth, a shark skeleton, 
dolphin skull and a sea turtle.> Two galena artifacts were found and galena 
comes from Missouri, the > Mississippi Valley, Illinois and Kentucky and was 
used for white > pigment and to make beads and pendants. The exact source of 
the Miami > Circle galena is Central Missouri.> Tools have been found made 
from deer feet and shark teeth and a > decorated bone artifact with engraved 
circles.> > News from Indian Country has this update with photos on the site 
and > its circular posts;> http://indiancountrynews.net/index.php? > 
option=m_content&task=ew&id(12&Itemid6> > Here is a tiny URL;> 
http://tinyurl.com/2yl9pl> > > Mike Ruggeri's Mississippians and Mound 
Builders including the Adena > and Hopewell> http://tinyurl.com/276d8z> > > 
 > > > > > > > > > > > 
 > --**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**> 
 > Message: 3> Date:!
  Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:30:24 -0500> From: Nick Hopkins <nhopkins at mailer.
fsu.edu>> Subject: [Aztlan] Mayas desaparecieron> To: Henry Avila 
<hwavila at tutopia.com>> Cc: Aztlan <Aztlan at lists.famsi.org>> Message-ID: 
<6DCB54C3-12E9-43BE-836F-FCB88C1BE8EC at mailer.fsu.edu>> Content-Type: 
text/plain; charset=O-8859-1; delsp=s; format=owed> > Al contrario, Henry. 
Claro que no es lo mismo despu?s de tantos > siglos, pero hay muchos 
aspectos de la(s) cultura(s) maya(s) actual > (es) que reflejan de manera 
tajante la cultura cl?sica. En mi campo > de especializaci?n, es notable que 
la estructura de una narraci?n, > sobre todo si se trata de un mito sagrado, 
demuestra muchos elementos > que se ven tambi?n en los textos cl?sicos. A 
prop?sito, fue por > conocer los textos modernos que pudimos entender la 
importancia de > varios elementos ret?ricos en los textos cl?sicos, tales 
como la > sint?xis anormal que acompa?a el evento principal de una 
narraci?n. > Es s?lo un ejemplo, hay miles m?s. No olvide que la lengua 
misma une > a los mayas modernos con sus anc!
 estros.> > Nicol?s Hopkins> > On Mar 18, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Henry Avila 
wrote:> > > talvez lo ?nico que una a los mayas del cl?sico con los mayas > 
 > contempor?neos> > son los genes por lo dem?s son absolutamente distintos.> 
 > > 
 > --**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**> 
 > Message: 4> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:02:19 -0600> From: " Diego V?squez 
Monterroso " <cinco.eb at gmail.com>> Subject: Re: [Aztlan] Mayas 
desaparecieron por cambio en clima de> ciudades> To: "Henry Avila" 
<hwavila at tutopia.com>> Cc: LISTA AZTLAN <aztlan at lists.famsi.org>> 
Message-ID:> <532cdec80803181902o2ccfe39aked49cd6028abdb45 at mail.gmail.com>> 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=O-8859-1> > Henry:> > El argumento de los 
genes es el que se ha usado como sustituto para la> desaparici?n cultural de 
los mayas. Dicen "no desaparecieron, pero solo sus> genes heredaron". Eso es 
lamentable, porque impl?citamente asumen que son> un tip!
 o de "raza degenerada" argumento que estuvo muy de moda en Guatemala a
> finales del siglo XIX e inicios del XX, con ide?logos del nacionalismo 
> local> como Batres J?uregui y, lamentablemente, Miguel ?ngel Asturias. Ese 
> tipo de> argumentos coincidieron con la creaci?n de la naci?n 
> guatemalteca, y> perduran hasta la actualidad. As? que documentales e 
> "investigaciones" como> esas solo refuerzan impl?citamente esa idea.> > 
> Por cierto, a Nick Hopkins muchas gracias por la evidencia ling??stica,> 
> quiz? la prueba m?s conocida y difundida (pero no la ?nica) de la> 
> continuidad cultural de los mayas. Lo quieran o no, ah? est?n las pruebas> 
> en la propia cotidianidad de los pueblos.> > Saludos cordiales,> > 
>  > --**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**> 
>  > Message: 5> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:24:58 -0500> From: michael ruggeri 
> <michaelruggeri at mac.com>> Subject: [Aztlan] ANCIENT PACIFIC COAST TRADE 
> REPLICATED> To: aztlan at lists.famsi.org> Message-ID: 
> <E067DC60-D443-473D-AC17-49D52B8!
 6345E at mac.com>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=-ASCII; delsp=s; 
format=owed> > > Listeros,> > > Researchers and students at MIT built a 
replica of a raft that could > engage in trading voyages along the Pacific 
coast of the Americas and > tested it to stability and seaworthiness and 
cargo capacity made of > the same materials as found in Ecuador. They found 
that shipworms > were the biggest problem and they live along the Pacific 
coast and > devour the balsa wood rafts quickly. The researchers found that 
they > could make two round trip voyages between Peru and Western Mexico > 
before the raft needed replacing. The rafts cannot be left in harbor > long 
since this is where the shipworms enter.> > They found the voyages would 
take 6 to 8 weeks and could only be > taken when trade winds were favorable 
and as a result traders would > have to stay at their destinations for 6 
months to a year each trip. > This would have allowed for a transfer of 
knowledge between widely!
  > separated groups. The rafts had a capacity of 10 to 30 tons, the sa
me > capacity as the barges that once plied the Erie Canal.> > This is the 
first analysis to use modern engineering techniques to > determine design 
parameters and constraints of ancient watercraft to > prove the feasibility 
of this kind of trade.> > > Innovations Report has the story here;> 
http://www.innovations-report.de/html/berichte/verkehr_logistik/ > 
bericht-105942.html> > I have made a tiny URL;> http://tinyurl.com/32awn9> > 
Mike Ruggeri> > > > > Mike Ruggeri's Ancient West Mexico from the 
Pre-Classic to the Tarascans> http://tinyurl.com/32uo5m> > > > > > > > > > > 
 > > > > > 
 > --**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**> 
 > Message: 6> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:25:46 +0000> From: Doug Weller 
<dweller at ramtops.co.uk>> Subject: Re: [Aztlan] UPDATE ON THE MIAMI CIRCLE> 
To: aztlan at lists.famsi.org> Message-ID: 
<337967415.20080319152546 at ramtops.co.uk>> Content-Type: text/plain; 
charset=o-8859-1> >!
  Hi all> I don't know if people have seen this site:> 
http://www.bwpowell.com/archeology/miamimajor/miamimajor.html> maintained by 
someone who worked on the Miami Circle.> (I was born and raised not far from 
it but long before it was> discovered).> > Doug> > -- > -- > Doug Weller 
Moderator, sci.archaeology.moderated> Director and Moderator The Hall of 
Ma'at http://www.hallofmaat.com> Doug's Skeptical Archaeology Site: 
http://www.ramtops.co.uk> > > > 
 > --**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**> 
 > Message: 7> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:26:03 -0600> From: "Henry Avila" 
<hwavila at tutopia.com>> Subject: Re: [Aztlan] Mayas desaparecieron por cambio 
en clima de> ciudades> Cc: "'LISTA AZTLAN'" <aztlan at lists.famsi.org>> 
Message-ID: <200803191626.m2JGQHES008198 at www.famsi.org>> Content-Type: 
text/plain; charset=so-8859-1"> > > > > > Diego:> > > > Lo que a m? me 
parece lamentable es que la comunidad maya act!
 ual est?> avergonzada de su identidad y quieran ocultarla. En la ciuda
d preguntarle a> una persona si es maya es un insulto. Yo mismo tengo 
vecinos que hablan> Cackchiquel, tienen caracter?sticas mayas, pero lo 
niegan rotundamente.> > > > Ese es el sentimiento que percibo en las 
personas que veo tanto en la ciudad> como en los pueblos del interior de 
Guatemala, los Mayas quieren dejar de> ser Mayas y pasar a ser cristianos. 
Por eso yo pienso que la cultura maya> antigua (del precl?sico al 
poscl?sico) son una cultura aparte a la cultura> maya contempor?nea (o sea 
la que vive actualmente).> > > > Saludos cordiales,> > > > > > > > > > > > 
_____ > > De: Diego V?squez Monterroso [mailto:cinco.eb at gmail.com] > Enviado 
el: Martes, 18 de Marzo de 2008 08:02 p.m.> Para: Henry Avila> CC: LISTA 
AZTLAN> Asunto: Re: [Aztlan] Mayas desaparecieron por cambio en clima de 
ciudades> > > > Henry:> > El argumento de los genes es el que se ha usado 
como sustituto para la> desaparici?n cultural de los mayas. Dicen "no 
desaparecieron, pero solo sus> genes heredaron".!
  Eso es lamentable, porque impl?citamente asumen que son> un tipo de "raza 
degenerada" argumento que estuvo muy de moda en Guatemala a> finales del 
siglo XIX e inicios del XX, con ide?logos del nacionalismo local> como 
Batres J?uregui y, lamentablemente, Miguel ?ngel Asturias. Ese tipo de> 
argumentos coincidieron con la creaci?n de la naci?n guatemalteca, y> 
perduran hasta la actualidad. As? que documentales e "investigaciones" como> 
esas solo refuerzan impl?citamente esa idea. > > Por cierto, a Nick Hopkins 
muchas gracias por la evidencia ling??stica,> quiz? la prueba m?s conocida y 
difundida (pero no la ?nica) de la> continuidad cultural de los mayas. Lo 
quieran o no, ah? est?n las pruebas> en la propia cotidianidad de los 
pueblos.> > Saludos cordiales,> > > 
 > --**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**> 
 > Message: 8> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:26:17 -0400> From: "Collins, Lori" 
<lcollins at cas.usf.!
 edu>> Subject: Re: [Aztlan] UPDATE ON THE MIAMI CIRCLE> To: <aztlan at li
sts.famsi.org>> Message-ID:> 
<845C83C5F18D3D418333382DE34B8EFD08123C at MAILBOX2.cas.usf.edu>> Content-Type: 
text/plain; charset=so-8859-1"> > Greetings: > > For those interested, 
myself and Travis Doering conducted three-dimensional scanning of the Miami 
Circle and the 'Royal Palm Circle' sites located just across the river from 
one another. I am attaching our article which was the cover feature story in 
the Florida Anthropologist Miami Circle Special Edition. Also, you might 
want to visit the State of Florida website with all the details and some 
interactive functions at: 
http://www.flheritage.com/archaeology/projects/miamicircle/ > > There are 
many applications in Mesoamerica for this type of documentation.> > Best,> 
Lori> > <mailto:lcollins at cas.usf.edu> > > Lori Collins, Ph.D.> 
Instructor/Co-coordinator> Alliance for Integrated Spatial Technologies> 
University of South Florida> Department of Anthropology> (813)974-0613 
lcollins at cas.usf.edu <mailto:lcollins at cas.usf.edu> > !
 > Web Site: http://AIST.cas.usf.edu <http://aist.cas.usf.edu/> > Flickr 
Acct: http://www.flickr.com/photos/aist/sets/ 
<http://www.flickr.com/photos/aist/sets/> 
<http://www.flickr.com/photos/aist/> > > ________________________________> > 
From: aztlan-bounces at lists.famsi.org on behalf of Doug Weller> Sent: Wed 
3/19/2008 11:25 AM> To: aztlan at lists.famsi.org> Subject: Re: [Aztlan] UPDATE 
ON THE MIAMI CIRCLE> > > > Hi all> I don't know if people have seen this 
site:> http://www.bwpowell.com/archeology/miamimajor/miamimajor.html> 
maintained by someone who worked on the Miami Circle.> (I was born and 
raised not far from it but long before it was> discovered).> > Doug> 
 > --> --> Doug Weller Moderator, sci.archaeology.moderated> Director and 
Moderator The Hall of Ma'at http://www.hallofmaat.com 
<http://www.hallofmaat.com/> > Doug's Skeptical Archaeology Site: 
http://www.ramtops.co.uk <http://www.ramtops.co.uk/> > > > 
_______________________________________________> Aztlan mailing li!
 st> http://www.famsi.org/mailman/listinfo/aztlan> Click here to post a
 message Aztlan at lists.famsi.org> Click to view Calendar of Events 
http://research.famsi.org/events/events.php> > > > > 
 > --**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**> 
 > Message: 9> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:26:29 -0400> From: Benjamin Carter 
<spondylus.princeps at gmail.com>> Subject: Re: [Aztlan] ANCIENT PACIFIC COAST 
TRADE REPLICATED> To:> 
andean-and-amazonian-archaeology-discussion-group-owner at googlegroups.com> > 
Cc: Aztlan <aztlan at lists.famsi.org>, Andean and Amazonian Archaeology> 
Discussion Group> 
<andean-and-amazonian-archaeology-discussion-group at googlegroups.com>> 
Message-ID: <47E13EB5.7010506 at gmail.com>> Content-Type: text/plain; 
charset=O-8859-1; format=owed> > All,> > The question of whether or not 
South Americans were able to travel to > Central America/Mexico is one of 
great interest. However, it is quite > clear that the question of whether or 
not something is possible is > different t!
 han whether or not it happened. Other researchers have > already shown much 
of what is concluded in this short article (I look > forward to reading the 
scholarly article in the near future). I highly > suggest folks take a look 
at the work of Cameron Smith, who built a > full-size model and sailed from 
Salango, Ecuador up the coast (not a > miniature to float in the Charles- a 
useful project for students, but > completely not scientifically valid). 
Such vessels have been replicated > numerous times, the most famous being 
Thor Heyerdahl's Kon Tiki. Smith > is the one that determined that shipworms 
were a major issue (though > this was probably already known by local 
fisherman and sailors). He > determined that it was likely that, when in 
harbor, boats would have > been pulled up on the shore to dry out, which 
would have prevented > waterlogging and killed off the shipworms.Smith has 
published much of > this work online- I suggest a Google search to find out 
more.> > Similarl!
 y, the potential voyage has already been modeled by Richard > Callagha
n (Antiquity 2003).> > A couple of notes of relevant information about this 
argument. The > vessels (if they did indeed contact Mesoamerica) need not 
have come from > what is now modern-day Ecuador. Clinton Edwards, in many 
articles and at > least one book, solidly established that such sailing 
rafts were also > present in Peru, though mainly from Sechura and north.> > 
Similarly, it is often indicated that balsas are only present in > Ecuador. 
Unless there is something that I am missing, this does not > appear to be 
true. Balsa would have been available on the flanks of the > Andes almost 
down into Chile and certainly to the north into Colombia. > It is a fairly 
widely distributed genus. In fact, the Chongon-Colonche > Hills, the 
purported source of the balsas because this is the only > location near the 
alleged ports of trade (the major example being > Salango/Puerto Lopez area) 
where the trees grew, is not a great source > of balsa. Balsa trees do grow 
in these hills and t!
 hey were floated down > local rivers during the El Nino of 1998, but the 
trees are much more > plentiful elsewhere. This does not mean they were not 
available in > sufficient quantity nor that they were not used, only that we 
shouldn't > limit ourselves to this area.> > Lastly, since Jorge Marcos 
seminal article on Spondylus, it has been > assumed that it drove these 
voyages to the north. The Ecuadorian > Spondylus were in such high demand 
that they were overfished, forcing > trades to go ever further to the north. 
First, Spondylus is also > available on the north coast of Peru, a fact that 
has been known for a > long time, but repeatedly ignored (or glossed over). 
Second, his > interpretations were based upon the difficulty of acquiring 
Spondylus, > which supposedly lived at such depths so as to require 
professional > divers and evidence of overfishing. In my own research, I 
have found > that Spondylus (both S. princeps and S. calcifer) are actually 
available > in relative!
 ly shallow depths and may not have been difficult to harvest. > Simila
rly, in an exhaustive literature search as well as working in the > area for 
10 years, I have identified no DEFINITIVE evidence for > overfishing 
Spondylus on the coast of Ecuador throughout prehistory. Of > course, that 
doesn't mean it didn't happen, only that we don't have the > necessary 
evidence to support a hypothesis based upon overfishing.> > Could 
Ecuadorians (or Peruvians) sail to Mexico? It appears that it was > 
possible. However, did they actually do it? I think that remains to be > 
proven. Yes, I am aware of a number of arguments about the similarity of > 
textiles, dogs, shaft tombs, etc. between Ecuador and West Mexico, but I > 
think these need to be reassessed. I won't say that I can argue with all > 
of these arguments yet, but many of them appear to have conflated time > 
such that connections appear to be similar, but in fact are not. Also, I > 
think that they have severely ignored Middle America. I think many of > the 
answers lie there.> > Ben Carter> > micha!
 elruggeri at mac.com wrote:> > Listeros,> >> >> > Researchers and students at 
MIT built a replica of a raft that could> > engage in trading voyages along 
the Pacific coast of the Americas and> > tested it to stability and 
seaworthiness and cargo capacity made of> > the same materials as found in 
Ecuador. They found that shipworms were> > the biggest problem and they live 
along the Pacific coast and devour> > the balsa wood rafts quickly. The 
researchers found that they could> > make two round trip voyages between 
Peru and Western Mexico before the> > raft needed replacing. The rafts 
cannot be left in harbor long since> > this is where the shipworms enter.> 
 >> > They found the voyages would take 6 to 8 weeks and could only be taken> 
 > when trade winds were favorable and as a result traders would have to> > 
stay at their destinations for 6 months to a year each trip. This> > would 
have allowed for a transfer of knowledge between widely> > separated groups. 
The rafts had a capaci!
 ty of 10 to 30 tons, the same> > capacity as the barges that once plie
d the Erie Canal.> >> > This is the first analysis to use modern engineering 
techniques to> > determine design parameters and constraints of ancient 
watercraft to> > prove the feasibility of this kind of trade.> >> >> > 
Innovations Report has the story here;> > 
http://www.innovations-report.de/html/berichte/verkehr_logistik/bericht-105942.html> 
 >> > I have made a tiny URL;> > http://tinyurl.com/32awn9> >> > Mike 
Ruggeri> >> >> >> > > > 
 > --**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**--**> 
 > _______________________________________________> Aztlan mailing list> 
Click here to send a message Aztlan at lists.famsi.org> 
http://www.famsi.org/mailman/listinfo/aztlan> > > End of Aztlan Digest, Vol 
28, Issue 17> **************************************
_________________________________________________________________
Tecnología, moda, motor, viajes,…suscríbete a nuestros boletines para estar 
siempre a la última
Guapos y guapas, clips musicales y estrenos de cine.
_______________________________________________
Aztlan mailing list
http://www.famsi.org/mailman/listinfo/aztlan
Click here to post a message Aztlan at lists.famsi.org
Click to view Calendar of Events http://research.famsi.org/events/events.php






More information about the Aztlan mailing list