Ninth-Century Stelae of Machaquilá and Seibal

Introduction

The continuity across dozens of cities in the form, function, and iconographic conventions of their large-format stone sculpture has long been considered a diagnostic feature of Late Classic (A.D. 600-800) Maya elite culture. At the same time that production of such sculpture reached its apogee in both quantity and artistic sophistication in the eighth century, the elite class grew dramatically in size and inter-polity warfare increased in frequency. ¹   The resulting economic and social stress led to drastic changes in the ninth century, as one Maya polity after another ceased producing sculpture and was abandoned. Some polities, however, enjoyed new or renewed political success in the wake of this turmoil, effectively adapting to the changing social landscape. The sculpture of these polities both implemented Classic Maya visual conventions and incorporated innovations, some of which drew inspiration from 'non-Classic' Maya sources.

This study – a brief summary of the author's dissertation research – considers the ninth-century sculpture at two polities, Machaquilá and neighboring Seibal. Machaquilá and Seibal each enjoyed a brief political and artistic florescence in the ninth century, in the wake of endemic warfare that decimated the region's dominant political power in the latter part of the eighth century, namely the Mutal polity of the Petexbatún region. The stelae erected at Machaquilá and Seibal after the fall of Dos Pilas, the primary eighth-century capital of the Mutal polity, constituted distinct adaptive strategies that involved and modified Classic visual communicative conventions in different ways. Machaquilá's ninth-century stelae are remarkably conservative in both the basic composition and iconography of their imagery and in the structure and content of the accompanying hieroglyphic inscriptions. Over their regularly paced production sequence, however, Machaquilá's stelae evidence a gradual modification of the proportions of the human figure and a reduction of the manneristic sophistication typical of late eighth-century Classic sculpture, sequentially presenting ever-more streamlined and 'legible' compositions. This 'constricted' visual discourse suggests an insular development, though the formal changes may have facilitated recognition of subject matter for an audience less familiar with the obfuscating complexity of the eighth-century Maya visual culture. Seibal's stelae, on the other hand, exhibit a wide range of diverse inspirations, initially presenting a cacophony of Classic Maya visual devices, subject matter and iconography. Subsequently, new audiences seem to have inspired 'non-Classic' themes in the art of Seibal, resulting in heterogeneous, eclectic sculpture wherein Classic Maya conventions became mere 'tokens' of the cultural unity they once reified.

Endnote

1. Miller 1993; Stuart 1993. More accurately, explicit references to inter-polity warfare increased significantly in the eighth century (Stuart 1993).

Table of Contents  |  Next Page

Return to top of page